Somatisation : Nosology to Biology
نویسنده
چکیده
Respected Chairperson, distinguished guests, members of the Indian Psychiatric Society, ladies and gentlemen. It is a matter of great privilege and honour for me to deliver the Tilak Venkoba Rao Oration on the occasion of ANCIPS2000. lam highly grateful to the Indian Psychiatric Society for bestowing me with this honour. As you know, this oration was instituted by Prof. A. Venkoba Rao and Prof. Parvathi Devi in the memory of their beloved son Tilak Venkoba Rao who lost his life in prime youth. I pay my humble respect to late Tilak. I would also like to pay my respect to my teachers, Prof. VK. Varma, Prof. P. Kulhara and Prof. Savita Malhotra, from whom I learnt psychiatry and basic principles of research. I am grateful to my earlier colleagues, Dr. M.S. Bhatia and Dr. Sabita Shome, who were also involved in my research on somatisation. I would also like to express my gratitude to the late Prof. Z.J. Lipowski, whose review paper on somatisation in Nov., 1988 issue of American Journal of Psychiatry initiated my interest in somatisation, the topic I have chosen for this oration. Patients presenting with physical symptoms without any organic basis have always remained an enigma for the physicians. These patients have been recognised for more than two millennia. The illnesses have received a wide variety of names like hysterike pnix by Plato in 427 BC, hysterika given by Galen in the second century AD, English malady by Cheynes in 1789, neurasthenia by Beard in 1868, conversion hysteria, hypochondriasis, psychosomatosis, etc. The term 'somatisation', which was introduced by Stekel in 1911 for the illness, has become quite popular in the last two decades, especially after the formal recognition of somatisation disorder as a diagnostic entity by DSM-III in 1980. Somatisation can be defined as a tendency to experience and communicate somatic distress and symptoms in response to psychosocial stress, unaccounted for by pathological findings, to attribute them to physical illness, and to seek medical help for them (Lipowski, 1988). Somatisation is neither a discrete clinical entity, nor the result of a single pathological or psychological process, and cuts across diagnostic boundaries (Kellner,1994). It is not an equivalent of somatisation disorder or somatoform disorders. The patients usually present in primary care settings and to physicians in general hospitals. They are often misdiagnosed and wrongly treated as suffering from physical illnesses. The phenomenon is responsible for significant distress and disability in the sufferers. It is estimated that a large pan of physicians' time and effort is spent on investigating and treating somatising patients and between 10-20% of the medical budget is spent on patients who somatise or have hypochondriacal concerns (Ford, 1983; Kellner,1991). In this oration, I shali be discussing about evolution of the concept of somatisation. clinical presentation of somatisation, related nosological issues and biological research in somatisation.
منابع مشابه
Subtyping patients with heroin addiction at treatment entry: factor derived from the Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SCL-90)
BACKGROUND Addiction is a relapsing chronic condition in which psychiatric phenomena play a crucial role. Psychopathological symptoms in patients with heroin addiction are generally considered to be part of the drug addict's personality, or else to be related to the presence of psychiatric comorbidity, raising doubts about whether patients with long-term abuse of opioids actually possess specif...
متن کاملOn lumpers and splitters, or the nosology of genetic disease.
As Knut Faber pointed out in his Nosography,l mendelism contributed much to nosology by focusing attention on specific entities. Bacteriology, with its similar emphasis on specific etiology and specific entities, had a comparable effect. One need only recall that a century ago, symptoms such as jaundice, dropsy and anemia were viewed as entities, in much of medicine at least, to realize the nos...
متن کاملThe relation between parenting stress and adolescents' somatisation trajectories: a growth mixture analysis.
OBJECTIVE The impact of somatisation in adolescence is substantial. Knowledge on (predictors of) individual-level development of somatisation is necessary to develop tailored treatment. The current study assessed individual-level development of somatisation by means of latent mixed modelling. Parenting stress was included as a predictor of somatisation trajectory membership and within-trajector...
متن کاملSomatisation indexes as differential factors in psychogenic pseudoepileptic and epileptic seizures
One of the postulated factors responsible for psychogenic epileptic seizures is somatisation. The purpose of this study was to analyse differences in the levels of somatisation manifested in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) somatisation scales. Subjects were divided into three groups on the basis of a neurological examination and long-term video-monitoring. Group One (N=66...
متن کاملRunning head: Parenting behaviour and physiological responses The association between parenting behaviour and somatisation in adolescents explained by physiological responses in adolescents
Introduction. This study adds to knowledge on somatisation in adolescents by exploring its relation with parenting behaviour and the mediating/moderating role of physiological responses in adolescents to parenting behaviour. Method. Eighteen adolescents with high and eighteen adolescents with low somatisation scores and their mothers completed a discussion task, from which observed parenting be...
متن کامل